tmux-assistant-resurrect

Adoption judgment: This is reasonable to try in a small, reversible experiment if you already depend on tmux, but the current evidence is not strong enough to treat it as mature infrastructure for critical session recovery. The only supplied source is a GitHub Search Lead, whose page metrics show 71 stars and 26 forks. Those numbers demonstrate some attention, but they do not establish recovery reliability, compatibility, or maintenance quality.

Practical role: The project description says it persists and restores Claude Code, OpenCode, Codex CLI, and Pi AI coding assistant sessions across tmux restarts. Its intended concrete output is a way to return to an existing assistant session after a restart instead of rebuilding the workflow from scratch. The evidence does not say which state is saved, whether panes, windows, working directories, or process context are restored, or how failures and version changes are handled. Those capabilities therefore remain unverified.

Threshold and cost: This is not an AI model, a code-generation assistant, or tmux itself. A more accurate comparison is an open-source recovery helper around the tmux session lifecycle.